Covid-19 given opportunity to use ultrasound in the plaster room to continue secondary fracture prevention care: A retrospective Fracture Liaison Service study.

INTRODUCTION: Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) managed secondary fracture prevention services have been hampered during the COVID-19 pandemic. A challenging opportunity is to use pulse-echo ultrasound (P-EU) in the plaster room. The study had two objectives: can P-EU help our decision to justly avoid DXA/VFA scans in plaster treated women (50-70 years) after fracture and whether its use can encourage or nudge all plaster treated patients (>50 years) who need DXA/VFA scans. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 1307 patients (cohort: pre-COVID-19) and 1056 patients (cohort: peri-COVID-19), each of them ≥ 50 years after recent fracture, were studied. Only in women aged 50-70 years, we used a P-EU decision threshold (DI) >= 0.896 g/cm2 to rule out further analysis by means of DXA/VFA. All other plaster patients received P-EU as part of patient information. Peri-Covid-19, all performed DXA/VFA scans were counted until three months post-study closure. By then each patient still waiting for a DXA/VFA had received a scan. RESULTS: Peri-COVID-19, 69 out of 191 plaster-treated women aged 50-70 years were ruled out (36%), for plaster and not in-plaster treated women aged 50-70 years, it was 27%. Comparing all peri-to pre-COVID-19 plaster-treated women and men, a significant P-EU nudging effect was found (difference in proportions: 8.8%) P = .001. CONCLUSION: The combination of patient information and P-EU in the plaster room is effective to reduce DXA/VFA scans and allow extra patients to undergo DXA/VFA. After all, more than a quarter of 50-70 years old women in plaster did not need to be scanned.

Osteoporosis care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: A national survey.

This is a survey study concerning osteoporosis care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands. Respondents reported that osteoporosis care stagnated and lower quality of care was provided. This leads to the conclusion that standardization of osteoporosis care delivery in situations of crisis is needed. PURPOSE: During the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was no guidance of professional societies or guidelines on the organization of osteoporosis care in case of such a crisis, and treatment relied on local ad hoc strategies. Experiences from the current pandemic need to be taken into account for the near future, and therefore, a national multidisciplinary survey was carried out in the Netherlands. METHODS: A survey of 17 questions concerning the continuation of bone mineral density measurements by Dual Energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), outpatient clinic visits, and prescription of medication was sent to physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants working in the field of osteoporosis. RESULTS: 77 respondents finished the questionnaire, of whom 39 (50.6%) reported a decline in DXA-scanning and 36 (46.8%) no scanning at all during the pandemic. There was an increase in remote consultations for both new and control patient visits (n = 48, 62.3%; n = 62, 81.7% respectively). Lower quality of care regarding fracture prevention was reported by more than half of the respondents (n = 44, 57.1%). Treatment with intravenous bisphosphonates and denosumab was delayed according to 35 (45.4%) and 6 (6.3%) of the respondents, respectively. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, osteoporosis care almost completely arrested, especially because of the discontinuation of DXA-scanning and closing of outpatient clinics. More than half of the respondents reported a substantial lower quality of osteoporosis care during the COVID pandemic. To prevent an increase in fracture rates and a decrease in patient motivation, adherence and satisfaction, standardization of osteoporosis care delivery in situations of crisis is needed.